SFUSD: 45% of Students Expelled in 06-07 Were African American (edit this)
This is the first weekend in four weeks that I am in San Francisco.
But 2nd Back-to-School Institute for Parents and Caregivers of African American Students were held today at the Civic Center Secondary School (formerly John Swett Elementary School). And once I was there, I was very glad that I went to this very informative workshop.
Kim-Shree Maufas was the only school board member in attendance. Carlos Garcia and SFUSD’s new assistant superintendent for social justice were both absent. But Rickey Jones, director of Pupil Services did a great (but disheartening) presentation to the 30 parents, teachers and community members in attendance.
Jones showed that a total of 58 students were expelled from SFUSD in 06-07. Twenty-seven of these students (47%) were African American, even though African American only represent 12% of the district’s student population. Twelve of the expelled students identified themselves as Chinese Americans (52% of the district’s students are Asian American with Chinese American students compromising the largest group within that category) and eleven of the expelled students had Spanish surnames (21.3% of SFUSD’s students are Latino).
With suspensions, Jones noted that 3,743 students were expelled at SFUSD schools in 2006-07. Of that total, 1,827 (48%) were African American. The second largest group were Latino students who representated 26% of the students suspended at SFUSD in 2006-07.
The news gotten even bleaker when we looked at the 2006-07 chronic truancy records for SFUSD. Here is the table:
Grade/# of Chronic Truants (Missing 20 days or more of school)
Kindergarten-176 students 45.45% were African American/25% were Latino
First Grade-148 students 57.43% were African American/21.6% were Latino
Second Grade-115 students 57.39% were African American/21.74% were Latino
Third Grade-100 students 62% were African American/19% were Latino
Fourth Grade-105 students 50.48% were African American/25.7% were Latino
Fifth Grade-81 students 51.85% were African American/27.2% were Latino
Sixth Grade-76 students 52.6% were African American/21% were Latino
Seventh Grade-85 students 41.2% were African Americans/23.5% were Latino
Eighth Grade-87 students 28.74% were African Americans/33.3% were Latino
Ninth Grade-507 students 32.54% were African American/38.46% were Latino
Tenth Grade-323 students 34.7% were African American/33.44% were Latino
11th Grade-211 students 25.12% were African American/34% were Latino
12th Grade-139 students 23.7% were African American/27.97% were Latino
The groups were then divided into two workshop sessions-one on “Elementary School Foundations-Discipline, Responsibilities, Expectations and Advocacy” and “Middle and School Foundation-Discipline, Responsibilities, Expectations and Advocay.” As the Vice President of Fundraising at John Muir Elementary School, I went to the Elementary School workshop.
It was led by Jeremiah Jeffries in Room 101 at the former John Swett Elementary School. I realized that I had been in Room 101-when it was Jeremiah’s first grade classroom when John Swett Elementary was opened. He held the workshop in his former classroom. Chappie Grice of NAACP and Dr. David West, a former instructor from San Mateo Community College, were also co-ordinators.
During the workshop, we reviewed the San Francisco Unified School District’s 2007-08 Student and Parent/Guardian Handbook. Jeffries pointed out that on page 98 on the 151-page handbook, the District finally placed its only paragraph on the importance of Family Involvement. So much for encouragement of parents to be involved in their children’s education.
We also reviewed the State Education Code 48900 which shows the offenses that lead to suspension. Jeffries noted that 60-70% of the suspensions were for offenses described as “defiance acts.” This is defined under State Education Code 48900 as “the refusal of a student to follow the direction of a school employee. This includes but not to limited to the following: verbal abuse or gestures, refusal to give legal name, disrespectful language, or failure to accompany the employee to the office.” The second most common offense for suspension at SFUSD is fighting among students, according to Jeffries.
The group then discussed on addressing discipline problems by creating a relationship with your child”s student and principal, using positive affirmation to reward good behavior, becoming an active part of the child’s school and actively listening to the student when he/she discusses his day at school.
It was a great and informative workshop and kudos to all (Kim-Shree Maufas, Jeremiah Jeffries, Carl Barnes, Chappie Grice, David West and others) who put it together.

December 9th, 2007 at 1:17 am e
Does anyone have an idea why there is such a jump in truancy numbers between 8th and 9th grades? Presumably the progressive decline in number of chronic truants from 9th-12th grades reflects drop-outs (a related problem).
December 9th, 2007 at 1:55 pm e
The students go from middle school to high school. So there are several factors-those who were feeling behind in middle school feel a even wider gap in high school, the 8th graders were the big guys on campus and 9th graders are the lowest group in terms of status on the campus, and our middle schools tend to be smaller than our traditional high schools-so the students don’t have as many teachers who are personally acquainted with them and wondering where they are not in class.
December 9th, 2007 at 10:28 pm e
I wonder if you looked at the numbers, if you’d find higher truancy in the big high school than the small ones. I don’t have time to look at them myself, but my guess is no.
I have to emphasize that when you talk about “chronic truants” in the early grades — K-3, at least — you are totally, 100% talking about parents who were too ****ed-up to get their kids to school. Those parents are also the least likely to pay attention to any communications from the school, so the responsibility is entirely on them. Those parents DEFINITELY are not reading the parent handbook, nor showing up at the school orientation, coming to parent-teacher conferences or reading what the child brings home in the backpack. So what, specifically, should the school do to remedy the situation? I say you’re blaming educators for family and social pathology.
December 9th, 2007 at 10:35 pm e
Was there any discussion of the UNDERLYING reason why so many AA students are expelled? (cursing, foul language, etc., are mentioned, but no underlying reasons).
Was it Racism, as Jane Kim thinks?
Poor parenting, or lack of parenting?
“Jeffries pointed out that on page 98 on the 151-page handbook, the District finally placed its only paragraph on the importance of Family Involvement.”
This seems so obvious to me that why should the district even have to mention it at all in its handbook. It’s like saying, “a good breakfast is good for nutrition and for school children.”
December 10th, 2007 at 6:51 am e
At the Parents conference, the superintendent talked about the importance of parents being involved in their children’s education. But putting that on page 98 of the parents handbook makes it seem like the district isn’t putting any importance into parent involvement.
The first page of the parents handbook is devoted to listing the members of Board of Education.
December 10th, 2007 at 8:02 am e
Here are the latest truancy numbers for SF high schools, reflecting the 2006-07 school year. As you can see, there is no correlation between the size of the school and their truancy rate - it is the larger high schools which tend to have the lowest truancy rates.
Lincoln (enrollment 2343) truancy rate 15.32%
Washington (2306) truancy rate 14.09%
Galileo (2224) truancy rate 25%
Burton (1338) truancy rate 46.79%
Balboa (1098) truancy rate 32.33%
O’Connell (819) truancy rate 46.03%
Mission (864) truancy rate 68.98%
Wallenberg (647) truancy rate 22.57%
Marshall (642) truancy rate 36.92%
ISA (421) truancy rate 37.29%
June Jordan (371) truancy rate 67.65%
December 10th, 2007 at 9:20 am e
How are we ever going to close the “achievement gap” with truancy rates like this:
Grade/# of Chronic Truants (Missing 20 days or more of school)
Kindergarten-176 students 45.45% were African American/25% were Latino
First Grade-148 students 57.43% were African American/21.6% were Latino
Second Grade-115 students 57.39% were African American/21.74% were Latino
Third Grade-100 students 62% were African American/19% were Latino
December 11th, 2007 at 8:26 am e
June Jordan (371) truancy rate 67.65%
So June Jordan, cited by Linda Darling-Hammond, a Stanford professor, as an exemplary charter school at the Achievement Gap Summit in Sacramento, has a 67% truancy rate.
What, then, are the truancy rates at the UNexemplary charter schools?
December 11th, 2007 at 8:40 am e
A slight correction — June Jordan isn’t a charter school, though it’s what’s called a Small School By Design (as opposed to a Small School by Accident that’s simply losing enrollment, I guess).
The rest of Nakayama’s comment raises an excellent question.
December 11th, 2007 at 6:11 pm e
Funny, posting again at the end of the day. My daughter’s entire 8th grade was pulled out of class today for a sales pitch for June Jordan. She actually did know about the dead-last test scores but says she didn’t say anything. You gotta admit it would be amusing if she had asked about the test scores and truancy rate.